2014年12月17日 星期三

Revised Annotations (3)- Treaties Concerning Taiwan's Sovereignty

     In this annotation, I trace back to the history of Taiwan. Taiwan was given to Japan in 1895 according to the Treaty of Shimonoseki(馬關條約) as a result of losing The First Sino-Japanese War(甲午戰爭) which happened because of the sovereign rights over Korean Peninsula, so Taiwan was under Japanese governance during the period of WWI and WWII. As WWI was coming to an end, a wave of self-determination swept the world. “President Wilson presented his “14 points” as a blueprint of the handling of the war’s aftermath. Included in his “14 points” was the principle of self-determination for all people. In handling the aftermath of this war, the views of all people should be respected.”(15) At the same time, Korea was also under Japanese governance, and the Korean launched independence movement. Taiwanese intellectuals at that time were inspired by the movement and the concept of self-determination, so they were determined to strive for more freedom and equality in Taiwan. “We Taiwanese must seriously consider our future under Japanese rule.”(26) Taiwan’s leading intellectuals at that time were Cai Peihou(蔡培火) and Jiang Wieshuei(蔣渭水). These people along with Lin Siantang(林獻堂), considering that independence was impossible at the time, started the campaign to establish a representative assembly of Taiwan as the first step. This could be seen as the first sign of Taiwanese caring about the politics and Taiwan’s future.
     In November 1943, “World War II was drawing to a close and the Japanese were on the brink of defeat. The leaders of the allied powers, China, the United States and Great Britain, met at Cairo and the issue of Taiwan’s future was addressed. The U.S. backed Chiang Kai-shek in his request that Japan return Manchuria, Formosa and Penghu to the Republic of China.”(14) However, in the formal treaty, Treaty of Peace with Japan, which was signed at San Francisco in 1951, the request was not recorded. The original text of the treaty wrote, “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” It simply states that Japan “renounces” all right, but it doesn’t specify that Japan will give its right to the Republic of China.
     The popular dispute now in Taiwan is that which one is effective, Cairo Declaration in which Chiang Kai-shek requests that Japan return Manchuria, Formosa and Penghu to the Republic of China or Treaty of Peace with Japan? According to Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, Article 28, Non-retroactivity of Treaties, the latter should be more effective. If the Chinese National Party didn’t come to Taiwan after WWII, Taiwan would probably apply the principle of self-determination. Taiwan has the chance to become an independent country, and for this reason, some Taiwanese don’t recognize the name “Republic of China.” ROC is also refused in United Nation, and the reason could be that both People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China claim that they are the only and legitimate representative of China. This idea should be abandoned since one side one country has become the truth. To strive for a position in UN, using the name “Taiwan” is more practical.

Reference:
鄭丞鈞, 劉素珍, 劉昭淵and Peter Hillman, A History of Taiwan in Comics: The Japanese Era (II) : The Age of Awakening, Taipei, Green Futures Publishers Co., Ltd.
鄭丞鈞, 劉素珍, 劉昭淵and Peter Hillman, A History of Taiwan in Comics: The Post-World War II Era (I) : In the Realm of the Strongmen, Taipei, Green Futures Publishers Co., Ltd.

https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201155/volume-1155-I-18232-English.pdf

沒有留言:

張貼留言